Skip to main content

Personal Care Products


The two personal care products I looked up are:
1. Kiehl's Amino Acid Shampoo
2. EltaMD Skincare UV Pure Face and Body Physical Sunscreen Lotion, SPF 47
For 1) Kiehl's Amino Acid Shampoo, I found:
Health Risks: The overall hazard is rated "moderate." The high concerns are multiple, additive exposure sources and contamination concerns. The main moderate concern is organ system toxicity. 
My Response to this new knowledge:
I was surprised to find out the toxicity rating of this product is 5. I think I should choose a product that is less toxic in the future. I was shocked to find that there was a moderate concern for organ system toxicity as this seems like a very concerning risk to be taking with something as non-essential as shampoo. I had no idea that regular personal care products could have this much toxicity without having to notify us. 
For 2) EltaMD Skincare UV Pure Face and Body Physical Sunscreen Lotion, SPF 47 I found:
Health Risks: This product has very low health risks. The overall hazard is low and the main high concerns are biochemical or cellular level changes, contamination concerns, and persistence and bioaccumulation. Although these risks are a little worrisome, the overall rating is very good and I feel comfortable with this product. 
My Response to this new knowledge:
I was surprised to find out the toxicity rating of this product is 1. Even though I really don't like the idea of having any toxicity in my products, I really love this product and will definitely still continue to use it despite the low toxicity. I do think it is awesome that this product has such low toxicity and it made me happy that I chose a really great lotion for daily use. I love this product and have been using it daily for years and I am definitely going to look at other products by this brand and make the switch if I can, now that they know they are committed to high-quality products that do not put their consumers at risk. 
Overall, I think everyone should know about the risks and the FDA should require companies to tell us more clearly in their advertising and product labels, exactly what the toxicity and risks associated with the use of their products are. I am shocked that we all are so oblivious to the risks and I think that the reason we don't know them is that it is in the companies' best interests to keep these risks hidden from consumers who are buying their products. It is so misleading and unfair that they are allowed to do this and we need stricter laws that regulate what they can put in our products and how they notify us of what is in our products.

COMMENT ON youtube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-kc3AIM_LU

My Comments: I thought Ken Cook's video describing the toxic chemicals found in newborns to be very informative and compelling. I thought the "10 Americans" description was a creative and effective storytelling approach that made his message even more impactful. I was taken aback when he finally shared that the "10 Americans" he was referring to were newborns and the blood samples for this study were taken from the umbilical cord. It is shocking to me that they found an average of 200 different chemicals in each baby (with 287 total different chemicals found). I was also particularly surprised that they found 212 chemicals that had been banned for 30 years before the samples were even taken. I found it very interesting to think about how environmental pollution can be passed down for generations. It is heartbreaking to think about the environmental justice aspect of this and how vulnerable and marginalized people suffer greater consequences than everyone else and the negative health impacts are being compounded over generations of being marginalized. I was surprised that this idea that environmental pollution begins in the womb is not more widely recognized and discussed. I found the information on the low amounts of various medications needed to have an effect on people to be particularly compelling. I would love to learn more about what precautions women planning to get pregnant should take and how far in advance they should start to think about changing their diet and medications prior to trying to conceive. Ken's talk was eloquent and easy to understand. His call-to-action to introduce public health legislation to protect people was highly motivating but felt especially disheartening given the assault on environmental and public health policies by the current U.S. President. I would love to see an updated study done today to see if things have improved or worsened since this video was published in 2012. 

Comments

  1. Hello V,

    It's great that your sunscreen has such a low level compared to a lot of the other products I saw on the website. They advised to use sunscreen with SPF lower than 50 so you are right on the mark with one that has SPF 47.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

M3.2 Vulnerable Populations

Why are we still ONLY focused on sedentary lifestyles and diets when addressing obesity in the US?  Why are we not also looking at ways to decrease exposures to those chemicals that may be contributing to the epidemic? I think one main reason we are focused on sedentary lifestyles and diets instead of exposures is that the U.S. has a very strong individualistic culture that is biased towards making every problem about individual responsibility. It feeds into the narrative that we are individually responsible for our welfare and success and are able to determine our health based on the individual choices we make. Another main reason for this focus, and for this culture more generally, in my opinion, is that it is in the interest of major U.S. corporations to distract us and blame individuals for their poor health rather than take responsibility for the ways in which the chemicals they are exposing us to are contributing to this epidemic and others. Their interest first and f...

M4.6 Radon

Given that there are an estimated 21,000 excess deaths from lung cancer associated with exposure to radon,   how would you develop a national awareness campaign?   Name some of your potential collaborators (stakeholders). Developing a national awareness campaign would be challenging because I think people generally don't like to pay attention to environmental exposures and associated health risks unless they have been directly affected by the toxin in question. For a national awareness campaign regarding radon exposure, I would collaborate with the following organizations: American Lung Association Lung Cancer Foundation of America Lung Cancer Alliance American Cancer Society American Public Health Association American Medical Association American Nurses Association Home Depot, Lowes and other local hardware stores (a campaign for them to sell more radon testing kits) First Alert (makers of radon testing kits to include them in a campaign to sell kits) I think th...

M10.2 Blog about MSDS and ToxNet

Obtain a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) from your workplace or from the workplace of a family member or friend.   Material Safety Data Sheets are chemical information sheets created by chemical manufacturers that all employers are required to obtain and keep for any potentially hazardous chemicals in the workplace. For this blog post, I tried to find a material safety data sheet (MSDS) from UCSF. The MSDS I found is for "Equi-soft Foam Antimicrobial Handsoap"  Here is a link to the MSDS:  https://cleanhands.ucsfmedicalcenter.org/docs/Product%20information/Arichive/Equi-soft_Foam_MSDS.pdf Review  the MSDS and answer the following questions: What are the health risks associated with this chemical? There are four chemicals in the antimicrobial handsoap:  2-methylpentane-2,4-diol; amines, coco alkyldimethyl, n-oxides; Polyethylene Glycol; and benzalkonium chloride.  The health risk associated with these chemicals is they can cause eye irrita...