Skip to main content

M3.1 Biomonitoring

The following chemicals were found at levels for which there are no “safe” levels:
Chemical(s)
Potential Health Effects 
Dioxins
Carcinogen, endocrine disruptor, cognitive disfunction
DDT 
Reproductive toxicant
Organophosphate
(pesticide) neurotoxicant, Parkinson’s
Lead
Neurotoxicant, kidney toxicant, insomnia, impotence
Solvent
Liver toxicant, neurotoxicant
PCBs
Carcinogen, toxic to immune, neuro, and repro systems
Phthalates
Repro toxicant (infertility), testicular damage, endometriosis, endocrine disruptor
If I received the above lab results, my first thought would be to wonder what having an unsafe level of these toxins in my body means for my health now and longterm and what it means for my future children's health if I decide to have them one day. My initial feelings are hopelessness and sadness because it feels like there is nothing I can truly do to avoid these toxins if I want to live in this country and in the densely populated Bay Area. I think that the government is the only body that has incentive and is capable of actually protecting us from exposure to these toxins but historical evidence shows that they are not likely to do anything without immense public pressure and even then, much of the environmental toxins we are at risk of exposure to are obfuscated by powerful companies that have a financial interest in hiding these facts and continuing to use these toxins in their products. I know there have been a few successful campaigns to reduce or ban use of certain toxins but it feels like our exposure increases across the globe at an exponential rate and without a system put in place by the government to review and regulate all environmental toxins before they are brought to market, these campaigns are all too late to really protect our health. I would like to understand exactly what these toxins do at very low levels and all the ways my health is impacted on a more granular level. 

Comments

  1. KJSeptember 15, 2019 at 1:34 PM

    Knowing that our government knows how deadly these toxins are to us, but not fighting tooth and nail to protect their people from these private factories and companies is disheartening. The crazy thing is that some of these chemicals are in everyday items that we use, so with proper awareness it seems as though we must fight to protect ourselves.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

M3.2 Vulnerable Populations

Why are we still ONLY focused on sedentary lifestyles and diets when addressing obesity in the US?  Why are we not also looking at ways to decrease exposures to those chemicals that may be contributing to the epidemic? I think one main reason we are focused on sedentary lifestyles and diets instead of exposures is that the U.S. has a very strong individualistic culture that is biased towards making every problem about individual responsibility. It feeds into the narrative that we are individually responsible for our welfare and success and are able to determine our health based on the individual choices we make. Another main reason for this focus, and for this culture more generally, in my opinion, is that it is in the interest of major U.S. corporations to distract us and blame individuals for their poor health rather than take responsibility for the ways in which the chemicals they are exposing us to are contributing to this epidemic and others. Their interest first and f...
Post a Comment
Read more

M4.6 Radon

Given that there are an estimated 21,000 excess deaths from lung cancer associated with exposure to radon,   how would you develop a national awareness campaign?   Name some of your potential collaborators (stakeholders). Developing a national awareness campaign would be challenging because I think people generally don't like to pay attention to environmental exposures and associated health risks unless they have been directly affected by the toxin in question. For a national awareness campaign regarding radon exposure, I would collaborate with the following organizations: American Lung Association Lung Cancer Foundation of America Lung Cancer Alliance American Cancer Society American Public Health Association American Medical Association American Nurses Association Home Depot, Lowes and other local hardware stores (a campaign for them to sell more radon testing kits) First Alert (makers of radon testing kits to include them in a campaign to sell kits) I think th...
Post a Comment
Read more

M10.2 Blog about MSDS and ToxNet

Obtain a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) from your workplace or from the workplace of a family member or friend.   Material Safety Data Sheets are chemical information sheets created by chemical manufacturers that all employers are required to obtain and keep for any potentially hazardous chemicals in the workplace. For this blog post, I tried to find a material safety data sheet (MSDS) from UCSF. The MSDS I found is for "Equi-soft Foam Antimicrobial Handsoap"  Here is a link to the MSDS:  https://cleanhands.ucsfmedicalcenter.org/docs/Product%20information/Arichive/Equi-soft_Foam_MSDS.pdf Review  the MSDS and answer the following questions: What are the health risks associated with this chemical? There are four chemicals in the antimicrobial handsoap:  2-methylpentane-2,4-diol; amines, coco alkyldimethyl, n-oxides; Polyethylene Glycol; and benzalkonium chloride.  The health risk associated with these chemicals is they can cause eye irrita...
Post a Comment
Read more