Skip to main content

M3.4 Air Pollution

Using your zip code (or the zip code from your family home, find out the following and enter info in your BLOG. 
My zip code is 94612 in Alameda County. 
  • Who and what are the top polluters in your zip code?
The top polluter in my zip code by far (499,459 lbs.) is New United Motor MFG in Fremont, CA. Second place with only 44,985 lbs. is Arch Mirror West in Newark, CA. New United Motor is an automobile manufacturing company and Arch Mirror West is an architectural glass and aluminum fabrication and distribution company. After these polluters are (in order) Pacific Galvanizing (23,455 lbs.), Acme Fiberglass (14,147 lbs.), and U.S. Pipe and FNDY (13,995 lbs.). 

  • What percent of the homes in your zipcode have lead-based paint?
3% of homes in Alameda County have a high risk of lead hazards due to lead-based paint in homes built before 1950.

  • Are there Superfund sites in your zip?  (In your BLOG, make sure to tell us what a Superfund Site is)
Superfund sites are the worst toxic waste sites. My community has 4 superfund sites: Alameda Naval Air Station, AMCO Chemical, Lawrence Livermore Lab Site 300, and Lawrence Livermore Laboratory. 

  • What can you tell us about the Superfund sites that are near where you live?
Two of the superfund sites (Lawrence Livermore Lab Site 300 and Lawrence Livermore Laboratory) have caused contamination of drinking water sources in our community. Below I have included images describing the detected contaminants and pre-cleanup rankings of each of the 4 sites:

1. Alameda Naval Air Station:
2. AMCO Chemical:
3. Lawrence Livermore Lab Site 300:
4. Lawrence Livermore Laboratory:

  • What did you learn about the air quality in your zipcode?
In 2003, Alameda County ranked among the dirtiest/worst 10% of all U.S. counties in terms of person-days in exceedance of national air quality standards for ozone. This means, on average, only 86% of days had good air quality. Additionally, Alameda County also ranks among the dirtiest/worst 10% of all U.S. counties in terms of an average individual's added cancer risk from hazardous air pollutants. 

  • How about the water quality?
We rank pretty low in water quality as well. 80% of our rivers, streams, and creeks are polluted with pesticides; 100% of our lakes, reservoirs, and ponds are polluted with mercury; and 100% of our estuaries, bays, and coasts are polluted with mercury. Here is how Alameda County ranks against all U.S. counties:

  • How did your zipcode fair on a social justice / environmental justice basis?
While the distribution by poverty and education was fairly equitable, especially compared to what I had predicted, I found the distribution by race to be particularly troublesome:
It is shocking to see the huge disparities between people of color and white people. I would be very interested to see how this changes due to gentrification of the area. Will gentrification result in more resources allocated to cleaning up these areas and reducing exposure or will we see a decrease in the distribution of burdens by race as more whites move into areas there were historically dominated by people of color?

Comments

  1. KJSeptember 15, 2019 at 1:22 PM

    WOW! This isn't good news to me. I just moved to Oakland this month so now I live in Alameda county. I wonder what they are doing to adjust these negative statistics? With housing being as high as it is, you would think that we would at least be entitled to fresh air and clean water. The stats for being in the top 10 percentile of dirtiness was about 16 years ago so I'm hoping things have improved since then.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

M3.2 Vulnerable Populations

Why are we still ONLY focused on sedentary lifestyles and diets when addressing obesity in the US?  Why are we not also looking at ways to decrease exposures to those chemicals that may be contributing to the epidemic? I think one main reason we are focused on sedentary lifestyles and diets instead of exposures is that the U.S. has a very strong individualistic culture that is biased towards making every problem about individual responsibility. It feeds into the narrative that we are individually responsible for our welfare and success and are able to determine our health based on the individual choices we make. Another main reason for this focus, and for this culture more generally, in my opinion, is that it is in the interest of major U.S. corporations to distract us and blame individuals for their poor health rather than take responsibility for the ways in which the chemicals they are exposing us to are contributing to this epidemic and others. Their interest first and f...
Post a Comment
Read more

M4.6 Radon

Given that there are an estimated 21,000 excess deaths from lung cancer associated with exposure to radon,   how would you develop a national awareness campaign?   Name some of your potential collaborators (stakeholders). Developing a national awareness campaign would be challenging because I think people generally don't like to pay attention to environmental exposures and associated health risks unless they have been directly affected by the toxin in question. For a national awareness campaign regarding radon exposure, I would collaborate with the following organizations: American Lung Association Lung Cancer Foundation of America Lung Cancer Alliance American Cancer Society American Public Health Association American Medical Association American Nurses Association Home Depot, Lowes and other local hardware stores (a campaign for them to sell more radon testing kits) First Alert (makers of radon testing kits to include them in a campaign to sell kits) I think th...
Post a Comment
Read more

M10.2 Blog about MSDS and ToxNet

Obtain a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) from your workplace or from the workplace of a family member or friend.   Material Safety Data Sheets are chemical information sheets created by chemical manufacturers that all employers are required to obtain and keep for any potentially hazardous chemicals in the workplace. For this blog post, I tried to find a material safety data sheet (MSDS) from UCSF. The MSDS I found is for "Equi-soft Foam Antimicrobial Handsoap"  Here is a link to the MSDS:  https://cleanhands.ucsfmedicalcenter.org/docs/Product%20information/Arichive/Equi-soft_Foam_MSDS.pdf Review  the MSDS and answer the following questions: What are the health risks associated with this chemical? There are four chemicals in the antimicrobial handsoap:  2-methylpentane-2,4-diol; amines, coco alkyldimethyl, n-oxides; Polyethylene Glycol; and benzalkonium chloride.  The health risk associated with these chemicals is they can cause eye irrita...
Post a Comment
Read more