Skip to main content

M3.5 Transportation

BLOG about your personal experience regarding transportation and its implications for your health and the health of your communities and air quality.

When I lived in San Francisco, my commute to UCSF was very short and I often would just call an uber to and from work, which is very bad for the environment. Now that I live in Oakland, I actually use public transportation much more because of the heavy traffic on the Bay Bridge. I take BART and MUNI every day to commute to and from work and school. I think my health is slightly better because  I get much more physical activity due to using public transportation whereas before I would get picked up and dropped off at my destinations and never walk more than a few steps. I also feel better knowing I am not contributing to increased air pollution by using private vehicles and contributing to the already horrific traffic in the Bay Area. I just wish public transportation in the Bay Area was more affordable, convenient, and predictable. I know many people who cannot afford to use BART to commute to work every day and end up giving up jobs in the city because it doesn't make economic sense. It is sad to see the city becoming a gated community and locking low-income people out of living or working there due to the high costs of public transportation, toll, and parking in the city of San Francisco. I am hopeful that decreasing my uber use decreased my negative contribution to our community's air quality but I think overall, too many people are using ride-sharing services instead of public transportation due to convenience and comparable cost and this is worsening our air quality rather than improving it due to sharing cars. 

Comments

  1. I absolutely agree with you. I now work in San Francisco while living in Oakland so I take the BART almost daily. The parking at the Bart station is $3 a day, plus almost $9 roundtrip. That is $12 a day or $60 in a work week. I am thankful that I am able to afford it, but it is still expensive. Also some days I'm not in the mood to take BART so I might take a Lyft or Uber which isn't good for the environment nor improves the traffic situation in SF.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

M5.2 Safe Drinking Water

Safe drinking water is one of the most essential needs of our health. Safe drinking water is a universal basic human right that every person should be guaranteed. It is my view that this is the least our government should be able to guarantee for us. The Clean Water Act has such profound public health significance because it regulates the discharge of pollutants into all our country's lakes, rivers, streams, wetlands, coastal areas, and other surface waters. Under the Clean Water Act, the EPA sets national standards for water quality and defines water quality criteria, including the specific levels of various pollutants that are allowable under these criteria. The Clean Water Act is a vital step in the right direction, but we need stricter standards and evidence-based criteria for water quality. We need stronger advocacy for policies that protect all our water. 

M10.2 Blog about MSDS and ToxNet

Obtain a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) from your workplace or from the workplace of a family member or friend.   Material Safety Data Sheets are chemical information sheets created by chemical manufacturers that all employers are required to obtain and keep for any potentially hazardous chemicals in the workplace. For this blog post, I tried to find a material safety data sheet (MSDS) from UCSF. The MSDS I found is for "Equi-soft Foam Antimicrobial Handsoap"  Here is a link to the MSDS:  https://cleanhands.ucsfmedicalcenter.org/docs/Product%20information/Arichive/Equi-soft_Foam_MSDS.pdf Review  the MSDS and answer the following questions: What are the health risks associated with this chemical? There are four chemicals in the antimicrobial handsoap:  2-methylpentane-2,4-diol; amines, coco alkyldimethyl, n-oxides; Polyethylene Glycol; and benzalkonium chloride.  The health risk associated with these chemicals is they can cause eye irrita...

M4.2 National Library ToxNet

Health Effects of Exposure to common chemicals Using the National Library ToxNet database (specifically the HPD and HSPD databases), I was able to find out a lot about the negative health effects associated with exposures to urea formaldehyde, which is found in pressed board- a common building material that I had never even heard about, but that most of us are exposed to almost daily. One health effect associated with urea formaldehyde exposure is cancer of the nasopharynx and leukemia. Additionally, a study of female workers in the garment industry showed that exposure caused an increased incidence of menstrual disorders,  inflammatory disease of the reproductive tract, sterility, anemia, and low birth weights among offspring. Using the National Library ToxNet database (specifically the HPD, HSPD, and TOXLINE databases), I was also able to find out a lot about the negative health effects associated with exposures to bleach, which is a common cleaning product th...